806
Key politics, the thing I despise the most. By confusing established faits dug from different perspectives, they fall into the abyss of valuelessness, and make conflicts reasonlessly, and never want to reflect on others' views to confirm if they are really arguing on the same issue, to solve the messy threads. And finally they'll always be led to likely adhering one's own faiths, to don't let themselves views be destroyed, which phase I call the trash time. The trash time is boring but efficient for attack, and for which there have conformed a special "greeting" that show one's ideology. Once I judge out one's ideology, I can utilize it aa weakness to lunch attack continuously.
Then I'd say that the ideology is much like to the IMBT, insufficient and exclusive like it. What the insufficient means? Want to divide the people of rich consciousness into mere a few opposing classes or simply binary. What the exclusive means? Based on such insufficient division, every class have established a closed circle or group, which have mission of attacking other opposing classes. Naive.
So, what would I do during an topic of key politics? Neglect is the first and beneficial, but a kind of cheating. If you must to leave some traces of your pass-by, the selection with the most benefit rate is so called one strike detached from tactics. It's a kind of spiritual victory method, dirty and hypocritical, and a destroyer of network environment. But when be in the chaos of key politics, I'd say that it's the justice.